Added: Nov 2, 2006
From: nine9999
Duration: 5:3
5th gear - Fiat Panda 4x4 vs Range Rover
Channel: Autos
Spas117 Says:
Dec 17, 2008 - yeah, i was thinking bigger.... a V8 wouldn't fit but still, get as big as you can :P
D41H4T5U Says:
Dec 18, 2008 - you never know, people squeeze V8's into Mini's don't they?
Spas117 Says:
Dec 18, 2008 - yeah, and i've seen a 427 V8 in a VW Beetle, but that was heavily modded and half the cabbin was engine.
PapaGDirector Says:
Dec 19, 2008 - Bling RR = loser royal ! My bro's neighbour got a black Range Rover on 22" wheels etc etc for £104,000 then all within 3 weeks his woman left him for a kid with a red Ferrari, he pulled some cheep ladies at a baddass club and they puked up in it on the way back, now it stinks when the seats get warm, to top it off: the tax man has got him spending money he "didn't have" so it will cost him nearly a mill-seven.......he would have been about 8miles better off with that cool little panda ; )
rainyi213 Says:
Dec 22, 2008 - 1. hold yur breath 2. go to different video. 3.leave this comment. 4.if u do all without letting go of your breath u r a good kisser!!!
Valvo182 Says:
Dec 23, 2008 - no, not very much i think...ur from usa right? i don't say that american is similar to italian, but i believe that u can learn easily... i'm italian
poojacrew Says:
Dec 23, 2008 - oh yea i am from the US but thanks
Snapped01 Says:
Dec 28, 2008 - rane rovers ftw
actualelbekko Says:
Dec 29, 2008 - 6 MPG? There's a new one.
D41H4T5U Says:
Dec 29, 2008 - Well clarkson got 8 MPG in the RR when he tested it, the Panda Cross got 60 MPG when 4x4 magazine tested it. Big difference, also road tax for the RR would be £400+ a year, £110 a year for the Panda. I have the 2wd Panda and have had 82 MPG.
kyle13131 Says:
Dec 30, 2008 - From what he described it sounds like the panda has AWD not 4WD
Sayno2Utube Says:
Jan 2, 2009 - i have a RR classic and i must say of all the so called 4x4s i have owned it out preforms all with ease. i think if anyone says anything untrue about them it is because of a number of the following reasons; 1.they have never owned or properly used one in the correct manner or condition in which is feasible for the situation for a vehicle with such a heavy power to weight ri ratio. 2 or the subject had some poor turn of luck of road somewhere.
4rescue Says:
Jan 3, 2009 - Wow... what this guy doesn't know about 4x4's could fill a book... Unimogs, Landcruiser HZJ78's,well any Toyota 4x4 really: these are the real kings of the dirt.
LordKnassus Says:
Jan 4, 2009 - it's exactly the same. AWD means All Wheel Drive, 4WD means 4 Wheel Drive...
flowerman2705 Says:
Jan 5, 2009 - theres a new one
D41H4T5U Says:
Jan 5, 2009 - If by "new one" you mean the Panda Cross, it's been on sale in the rest of Europe for 3 or 4 years now but it's finally hit the UK. I drove one 340 miles on a test drive and it was great fun! Fantastic off road and did 46 MPG although it's possible to get 60 MPG.
hzj79 Says:
Jan 9, 2009 - total waste of time! the terrain in this comparison can be traveresed by any 2wd with enough horses to push whatever you drive past few steep parts. this got nothing to do with 4wding, normal gravel road with few puddles.
TheFartenator Says:
Jan 10, 2009 - WTF, when it got stuck the rear wheels were spinning and the front ones werent. Doesn't it have a diff lock?
Firefused Says:
Jan 12, 2009 - A Total farce and a bogus match, the Range Rover would take that out pulling ten pandas on a trailer lol
kyle13131 Says:
Jan 13, 2009 - Actually 4WD delivers a fixed amount of power to the front and rear where AWD sends power only to the wheels with traction.
alansari101 Says:
Jan 15, 2009 - i really want to see that car in Arabic desert
aljoshabre Says:
Jan 15, 2009 - lol
Hazmat0357 Says:
Jan 15, 2009 - some cars that are 4x4 still have more power going to the rear wheels... like 60%rear and 40% back
macShen Says:
Jan 17, 2009 - For this underdog joke i just faved it(=
D41H4T5U Says:
Dec 17, 2008 - The Panda Cross is exactly that! Has a turbo diesel engine and bigger wheels/tires etc and does 60 MPG, not 6 MPG like the RR